Analyse économique du droit

De Wikiberal.

La notion d'analyse économique du droit (en anglais, Law and economics) est utilisée pour désigner l'étude du droit et de la légalité par incorporation des méthodes et les idées issues de l'analyse économique et de la pensée économique.

Courant peu représenté dans le monde francophone, la discipline a été initiée aux États-Unis par l'école de Chicago : Richard P. Adelstein. Armen Alchian, Gary Becker, Guido Calabresi, Ronald Coase, Harold Demsetz, Aaron Director, Richard Posner... Parmi les auteurs qui ont une sensibilité prononcée vis à vis de l'école autrichienne, on compte : Joseph Becker, Walter Block, Gregory Scott Crespi, Elisabeth Krecke, Gerald O'Driscoll, Mario Rizzo, Linda A. Schwartzstein,

Philippe Simonnot, Ejan Mackaay et Jean-Yves Chérot sont les rares auteurs francophones à y consacrer leur intérêt.

Bibliographie

1980, Roy Cordato, The austrian theory of efficiency and the role of government, The Journal of Libertarian Studies, Fall, pp. 393-403

1982, Roger A. Arnold, Efficiency vs. ethics: which is the proper decision criterion in law cases?, The Journal of Libertarian Studies, Winter, pp49-57

1985, Steve H. Hanke, Rules versus cost-benefit analysis in the common law: a comment. Cato Journal, 4 (3) pp893-896

1989, Roy Cordato, “Subjective Value, Time Passage, and the Economics of Harmful Effects.” Hamline Law Review 12(2): 229–44

1990,
- Gregory B. Christainsen, Law as a discovery procedure. Cato Journal, 9 (3), pp497-530
- Pierre Coulange, La Production de Droit (The Production of Legal Rules), Journal des économistes et des études humaines, Vol 3, pp277-302

1991, Michael E. Debow, Markets, Government Intervention, and the Role of Information: An ‘Austrian School’ Perspective avec an Application to Merger Regulation, George Mason University Law Review, Vol 14, pp31-98

1993,
- Dieter Schmidtchen, Time, Uncertainty, and Subjectivism: Giving More Body to Law and Economics, International Review of Law and Economics, Vol 13, n°1, March
- Gregory Scott Crespi, Microeconomics Made (Too) Easy: A Casebook Approach to Teaching Law and Economics, Commentaier du livre de David W. Barnes et de Lynn A. Stout, Cases and Materials on Law and Economics, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 91, No. 6, mai, pp1560-1577

1994,
- Thomas C. Arthur, The Costly Quest for Perfect Competition: Kodak and Nonstructural Market Power," New York University Law Review (vol. 69, avril
- Gregory Scott Crespi, Teaching the New Law and Economics. University of Toledo Law Review 25, no. 3

1995, Joseph Becker, Procrustean Jurisprudence: An Austrian School Economic Critique of the Separation and Regulation of Liberties in the Twentieth Century United States, Northern Illinois University Law Review 15, pp671–718

1998, Gregory Scott Crespi, Exploring the Complicationist Gambit: an Austrian Approach to the Economic Analysis of Law, Notre-Dame Law Review 73(2), 315

1999, Shoshana Grossbard-Shechtman et Bertrand Lemennicier, Marriage Contracts and the Law-and-Economics of Marriage: An Austrian Perspective, Journal of Socio-Economics, 28: 665-690

2001, Gregory B. Christainsen et Brian C. Gothberg, The Potential of High Technology for Establishing Tradable Rights to Whales, In: The Technology of Property Rights, Terry L. Anderson et Peter J. Hill, Dir., Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield

2002,
- Laurent Carnis, Economic Approach of Crime: Mainstream Economics vs. Rothbard, Paper delivered in the honor of the 40th Anniversary of Murray Rothbard’s Man, Economy and State, mars, Ludwig Von Mises Institute, Auburn, Alabama
- Henk Folmer, Wim J. M. Heijman et Auke R. Leen, Product Liability: A Neo-Austrian Based Perspective, Revue European Journal of Law and Economics, Volume 13, Number 1, janvier, pp73-84

2004, Laurent Carnis, Pitfalls of the Classical School of Crime, The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Winter, 7(4), pp. 7-18

Dina Kallay, 2004, The Law and Economics of Antitrust and Intellectual Property. An Austrian Approach, Cheltenham, Elgar
Edmund W. Kitch, 1983, "The Fire of Truth: A Remembrance of Law and Economics at Chicago, 1932-1970, Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 163-234.
Elisabeth Krecke, 1996, Law and the Market Order: An Austrian Critique of the Economic Analysis of Law, Journal des économistes et des études humaines 7(1): 19-37
- Repris en 1997, In: Commentaries on Law and Economics, Robert W. McGee, dir., pp. 86–108
Ejan Mackaay et Stéphane Rousseau, 2008, Analyse économique du droit, Paris/Montréal, Dalloz-Sirey/Éditions Thémis, (2e éd.) ISBN-13: 978-2247071456
Paul Mahoney, 1997, The Exchange as Regulator, Virginia Law Review, 83, pp1453–1500
Paul Mahoney, 2001, The common law and economic growth: Hayek might be right. Journal of Legal Studies, 30(2), 503Β25
Linda A. Schwartzstein,
- 1992, Austrian Economics and the Current Debate between Critical Legal Studies and Law and Economics, 20 Hofstra Law Review, 1105 ff.
- 1994, ‘An Austrian Economic View of Legal Process’, 55 Ohio State Law Journal, 55, 1049
Michael W. Spicer, 1993, "On Friedrich Hayek & Public Administration -- An Argument for Discretion avecin Rules," Administration & Society, mai
Rob Teijl et Rudi W. Holzhauer, 1995, The Impact of the Austrian School on Law & Economics, In: Essays in Law and Economics II, Boudewijn Bouckaert et Gerrit De Geest, Dir., Antwerpen: Maklu Uitgevers

Ludwig van den Hauwe,
- 1998, `Evolution and the Production of Rules - Some Preliminary Remarks´, European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 5, n° 1, pp. 81-117
- 2000, `The Case for Supply-Side Economics Revisited: The Effect of Time Preference´, European Journal of Law and Economics, 10: 139-60
- 2005, `Friedrich August von Hayek (1899-1992)´, In: The Elgar Companion to Law and Economics, Ch 41, Seconde édition, Jürgen Backhaus, dir. pp545-558
Christopher T. Wonnell, 1986, ‘Contract Law and the Austrian School of Economics’, 54, Fordham Law Review, 507-543